PetVet Magazine PetVet Magazine
  • Issues
  • Subscribe
  • Advisory Board
  • Media Kit
  • Advertise
PetVet Magazine
  • Issues
  • Categories
    • Client Services
    • Best Practices
    • Business Trends
    • Beyond the Stethoscope
    • Industry News
    • Lifestyle
    • Why It Matters To Me
    • PetVet Profile
    • PetVet Top 10
    • Veterinarian Life Advice
  • Subscribe
  • Advisory Board
  • Media Kit
  • Advertise
  • Best Practices

Positive Reinforcement vs. Punishment: At What Cost Do You Save a Life?

  • 2019-05-30
  • Steve Dale, CABC
Positive Reinforcement vs. Punishment: At What Cost Do You Save a Life?
Total
12
Shares
12
0
0
0

What motivates this story is a local dog trainer who was recently “outed” for alleged use of aversive methods to save lives. That in itself sounds like a contradiction, doesn’t it?

When animal control agencies and rescues have nowhere else turn, some turn to him—and others like him around the country—to “rehab” aggressive dogs. Many dog trainers suggest they use aversive methods only to save lives. And these trainers may succeed. Or do they really?

The reality is that saving lives has become increasingly paramount—arguably too paramount. Shelters and rescues find themselves with aggressive dogs who they believe may be salvageable. And most are. Still, I make no apologies for my view that you can’t save them all. I don’t believe in placing truly dangerous dogs back into the community.

Of course, most aggressive dogs are fearful, even terrified. They learn the best defense is a strong and sometimes terrifying offense. There are numerous reasons for their aggression, and when trust is built, many dogs do settle into an even-tempered existence, albeit with limitations.

Sometimes certified animal behavior consultants or veterinary behaviorists do this rehab work. There’s little doubt their techniques will be based on positive reinforcement, and include a variety of humane tools. However, in reality, it’s mostly dog trainers taking on this difficult life-saving task. They’re under pressure from the shelters and rescues to work quickly. Also, the truth is that too many trainers—even under the most ideal circumstances—still prefer e–collars to cookies, and use what they know best, which may be primitive punitive methods.

These dogs have limited time left on their clock to live in the shelter or rescue, or where they are temporarily boarded and trained. With so little time and lots of pressure to succeed, does that justify a “just get it done” approach? The answer is decidedly, no.

Veterinarians have historically been taught, “Do what you need to in order to get the job done.” So, if it takes five people to hold down the dog for a blood draw, so be it. Decidedly, this “just get it done approach” is no longer acceptable in veterinary medicine. There are more humane alternatives, and those approaches are likely to be more effective long–term.

Shelters and rescues may feel good about saving that life—but do they really know what’s happening in that new home once adopted? Isn’t aversive training in itself a form of abuse?

Everyone’s personal tolerance and justification varies for tools and techniques.

I can tolerate and understand rationalization for the use of prong collars used correctly (as the trainer quickly transitions to a more humane collar), but I have absolutely zero acceptance for physically punishing a dog or using e-collars. Indeed, TV demonstrated that a popular dog trainer could—with adept timing— intimidate a dog to do whatever he wanted. However, being intimidated to do something clearly isn’t the same as learning. And I argue that since trust is required for this at–risk canine population, trust builds more slowly—if at all—using aversive methods. Being compliant isn’t equivalent to trusting.

If a dog is retrained and rehomed, and at some point reaches a threshold and bites, that dog’s life isn’t only at risk, a human family member has been harmed. Numerous scientific studies demonstrate long–term advantages of positive reinforcement training. But the trade–off isn’t any longer considered acceptable.

Shelters and rescues must begin to consider the approach used and expertise of those individuals chosen for the uniquely virtuous tasks of modifying behavior and temperament of at–risk dogs. Besides the goal to succeed long–term, it should also be to boost, not diminish, canine confidence.

One argument is that, in some communities, trainers with that level of Fear Free© understanding aren’t available, or simply cost more money if they do exist. I argue, where there is work—trainers will modify what they do in order to get the job. We need to adjust the level of acceptability.

If we really want to save our dogs we need to save them. You don’t save a drowning person who isn’t able to swim by rescuing him from the ocean only to throw him into a lake. Dogs deserve the best of what we know. Arguably, homeless dogs—who have been through so much as it is—deserve it even more.

We can no longer tolerate mistreatment. And based on what we know today, the use of punishment–based techniques, even coming from dog trainers with pristine intentions, is mistreatment. +

Total
12
Shares
Share 12
Tweet 0
Share 0
Pin it 0
Steve Dale
Steve Dale, CABC

Steve Dale, CABC (Certified Animal Behavior Consultant) is the author of a popular blog, www.stevedalepetworld.com. He is the host of two national radio shows, and is heard on WGN Radio, Chicago. His many TV appearances include Oprah to National Geographic Explorer, and is a contributor on syndicated “HouseSmarts TV.” Steve edited “Decoding Your Dog,” authored by American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, and has contributed to many books and publications. Steve speaks around the world at animal behavior and veterinary conferences and serves on the Boards of the Winn Feline Foundation and Human Animal Bond Association. His many awards and honors include the AVMA Humane Award, and he was inducted into the Dog Writer’s Association Hall of Fame.

Next Article
The Future Is Female: The Upsurge of Women in the Veterinary Industry
  • Business Trends

The Future Is Female: The Upsurge of Women in the Veterinary Industry

  • 2019-05-30
  • Dr. Natalie L. Marks, DVM, CVJ
View Post
Previous Article
5 Life Hacks for the Working Veterinary Parent
  • Lifestyle

5 Life Hacks for the Working Veterinary Parent

  • 2019-05-30
  • Dr. Justine Lee, DACVECC, DABT; CEO, VETgirl, LLC.
View Post
  • December 2022 / January 2023
    • 2022-12-06
  • Veterinarian Life Advice
    • 2022-12-14
  • Answering the Age-Old Client Question: “What Should I Feed My Pet?”
    • 2022-12-14
  • Dr. Jonathan Stockman: Dedicated to Dispelling Myths & Revolutionizing Pet Nutrition
    • 2022-12-14
  • The Environmental Impact of Pet Food Protein Sources
    • 2022-12-14
  • 4 Plant-Based Dog Food Myths Debunked
    • 2022-12-14
  • Are You a Smarte? The Secret to Practice Success
    • 2022-12-14
  • 3 Nutrition Hacks to Help You Take Charge of Your Health
    • 2022-12-14
  • Veterinary Hope Foundation: Offering Support for the Animal Care Community
    • 2022-12-14
  • PetVet Top 10
    • 2022-12-14
  • October/November 2022 Issue
    • 2022-10-12
  • Veterinarian Life Advice
    • 2022-10-18
Social Accounts
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Advisory Board
  • Media Kit
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
PetVet Magazine

A Practical Guide for Pet Health Professionals

Launching in the Summer of 2018, PetVet Magazine is an all-encompassing trade magazine that will cover all aspects of the ever changing veterinary industry. From customer service to the latest technology; PetVet Magazine will deliver Quality Content to Motivate & Educate Veterinarians and their staff.

© 2018-2022 PetVet Magazine

Issues
  • December 2022 / January 2023
  • October/November 2022 Issue
  • August/September 2022 Issue

Input your search keywords and press Enter.